4 ms·
This makes a lot more sense for large scale and high profile projects, and it eliminates low quality slop PRs by default with the contributors having to earn th
by rvz 9mo ago
This makes a lot more sense for large scale and high profile projects, and it eliminates low quality slop PRs by default with the contributors having to earn the trust of the core maintainers to contribute directly to the project.
- verdverm 9mo agoit also increases the barrier to new adopters why not use ai to help with the ai problem, why prefer this extra coordination effort and implementation?
- Rumple22Stilk 9mo agoThat's the whole point. There are many new adopters and few competent ones.
- verdverm 9mo agoI mean to well meaning contributors, I understand the goal of vouch, I think it goes too far and you'll turn off said well meaning contributors I certainly have dropped off when projects have burdensome rules, even before ai slop fest
- acedTrex 9mo agoThese projects would rather miss out on a few good people to stop the bad ones over the alternative.
- verdverm 9mo agoI think there are better alternatives, we'll let the market weed things out For example, I will keep making them spin wheels and burn tokens / money, a sort of honeypot, adversarial shadowban. This is even better for disincentivizing them. Will automate it if it ever gets bad
- tristan957 9mo agoThe barrier in the Ghostty project is to simply open a discussion. It's not really hard.
- verdverm 9mo agoWhat about fixing a typo in a comment? Do I have to start a discussion before I can submit a fix for a two char swap? Also, my statement was general, why are you making it about one?
- tristan957 9mo agoAs Mitchell said, the rules of engagement are defined per project. I'm giving you an example.