3 ms·
No-one serious is claiming 6x productivity improvements for close to equal quality This is proving GP's point that you're going off feels and/or exaggerating
by AstroBen 8mo ago
No-one serious is claiming 6x productivity improvements for close to equal quality
This is proving GP's point that you're going off feels and/or exaggerating
- redox99 8mo agoQuality is better both from a user and a code perspective. From a user perspective I often implement a feature and then just throw it away no worries because I can reimplement it in an hour again based on my findings. No sunken cost. Also I can implement very small details that otherwise I'd have to backlog. This leads to a higher quality product for the user. From a code standpoint I frequently do large refactors that also would never have been worth it by hand. I have a level of test coverage that would be infeasible for a one man show.
- xigoi 8mo ago> I have a level of test coverage that would be infeasible for a one man show. When a metric becomes a target, it ceases to be a good metric.