3 ms·
No where in the comment do they assert they are work for Microsoft. This is a peer-review.
by markstos 8mo ago
No where in the comment do they assert they are work for Microsoft.
This is a peer-review.
- PKop 8mo agoLet's just say they are pretending to be helpful, how about that? > "Peer review" no unless your "peers" are bots who regurgitate LLM slop.
- markstos 8mo agoYou think they lied about reproducing the issue? It’s useful to know if a bug can be reproduced.
- cmeacham98 8mo agoWe cannot know for sure but I think it's reasonably likely (say 50/50). Regurgitating an LLM for 90% of your comment does not inspire trust.
- PKop 8mo agoYes, of course I think they lied, because a trustworthy person would never consider 0-effort regurgitated LLM boilerplate as a useful contribution to an issue thread. It's that simple.
- cmeacham98 8mo agoIt's not a peer review it's just AI slop. I do agree they don't seem to be intentionally posing as an MS employee.
- usefulposter 8mo agoIt's performative garbage: authority roleplay edition. Let me slop an affirmative comment on this HIGH TRAFFIC issue so I get ENGAGEMENT on it and EYEBALLS on my vibed GitHub PROFILE and get STARS on my repos.