3 ms·
It has lots of optional features, none of which make it an object–oriented language. It's an everything–oriented language. It has lambda syntax for functors, bu
by direwolf20 9mo ago
It has lots of optional features, none of which make it an object–oriented language. It's an everything–oriented language. It has lambda syntax for functors, but you're not calling it an impure–functional programming language. Virtual functions are one feature, which is useful in pseudo–object–oriented code.