3 ms·
Yes but OpenClaw (which is a terrible name for other reasons) doesn't have "local" in the name and so is not misleading.
by backscratches 8mo ago
Yes but OpenClaw (which is a terrible name for other reasons) doesn't have "local" in the name and so is not misleading.
- outofpaper 8mo agoAs misleading. Lots of their marketing push or at least thr ClawBros pitch it as running local on your MacMini.
- lxgr 8mo agoTo be fair, you do keep significantly more control of your own data from a data portability perspective! A MEMORY.md file presents almost zero lock-in compared to some SaaS offering. Privacy-wise, of course, the inference provider sees everything.
- jagged-chisel 8mo agoTo be clear: keeping a local copy of some data provides not control over how the remote system treats that data once it’s sent.
- lxgr 8mo agoWhich is what I said in my second sentence.
- jagged-chisel 8mo agoIt’s worse than “[they] can see everything.” They can share it.
- lxgr 8mo agoIs it not a given that anyone that gets access to a piece of information is also capable of sharing it?
- dancemethis 8mo agoI mean, at least OpenClaw is funny in the sense that a D port could finish the roundabout by calling itself "OpenClawD"...