8 ms·
"Until prompt-to-binary is reliable enough that nobody reads the intermediate code, the analogy doesn't hold." 1. OK, let's create 100 instances of prompt unde
by BudapestMemora 8mo ago
"Until prompt-to-binary is reliable enough that nobody reads the intermediate code, the analogy doesn't hold."
1. OK, let's create 100 instances of prompt under the hood, 1-2 will hallucinate, 3-5 will produce something different from 90% of remaining, and it can
compile based on 90% of answers
2. computer memory is also not 100% reliable , but we live with it somehow without man-in-the-middle manually check layer?
- Lwerewolf 8mo agoI wonder what ECC is for. So, unless you're Google and you're having to deal with "mercurial cores"... Also, sorry, but what did I just actually attempt to read?
- zvitiate 8mo agoOkay but if you aren’t using RAIM or a TMR system then is he really wrong? And if you weren’t being snarky I’m sure you could understand. Generate 100 answers. Compare them. You’ll find ~90% the same. Choose that one.
- whoisthemachine 8mo agoComputer memory, even cheap consumer grade stuff, has much higher reliability than 90%. Otherwise your computer would be completely unusable!