3 ms·
To be precise, it’s exactly as local first as OpenClaw (i.e. probably not unless you have an unusually powerful GPU).
by lxgr 9mo ago
To be precise, it’s exactly as local first as OpenClaw (i.e. probably not unless you have an unusually powerful GPU).
- backscratches 9mo agoYes but OpenClaw (which is a terrible name for other reasons) doesn't have "local" in the name and so is not misleading.
- outofpaper 9mo agoAs misleading. Lots of their marketing push or at least thr ClawBros pitch it as running local on your MacMini.
- lxgr 9mo agoTo be fair, you do keep significantly more control of your own data from a data portability perspective! A MEMORY.md file presents almost zero lock-in compared to some SaaS offering. Privacy-wise, of course, the inference provider sees everything.
- jagged-chisel 9mo agoTo be clear: keeping a local copy of some data provides not control over how the remote system treats that data once it’s sent.
- lxgr 9mo agoWhich is what I said in my second sentence.
- jagged-chisel 9mo agoIt’s worse than “[they] can see everything.” They can share it.
- lxgr 9mo agoIs it not a given that anyone that gets access to a piece of information is also capable of sharing it?
- dancemethis 9mo agoI mean, at least OpenClaw is funny in the sense that a D port could finish the roundabout by calling itself "OpenClawD"...