2 ms·
Genuine question: what does this offer that OpenClaw doesn't already do? You're using the same memory format (SOUL.md, MEMORY.md, HEARTBEAT.md), similar archit
by mrbeep 8mo ago
Genuine question: what does this offer that OpenClaw doesn't already do?
You're using the same memory format (SOUL.md, MEMORY.md, HEARTBEAT.md), similar architecture... but OpenClaw already ships with multi-channel messaging (Telegram, Discord, WhatsApp), voice calls, cron scheduling, browser automation, sub-agents, and a skills ecosystem.
Not trying to be harsh — the AI agent space just feels crowded with "me too" projects lately. What's the unique angle beyond "it's in Rust"?
- avoutic 8mo agoI think a lot of people, me included, fear OpenClaw especially because it's an amalgamation of all features, 2.3k pull requests, obviously a lot of LLM checked or developed code. It tries to do everything, but has no real security architecture. Exec approvals are a farce. OC can modify it's own permissions and config, and if you limit that you cannot really use it for is strengths. What is needed is a well thought out security architecture, which allows easy approvals, but doesn't allow OC to do that itself, with credential and API access control (such as by using Wardgate [1], my solution for now), and separation of capabilities into multiple nodes/agents with good boundaries. Currently OC needs effective root access, can change its own permissions and it's kinda all or nothing. [1] https://github.com/wardgate/wardgate https://github.com/wardgate/wardgate
- cpursley 8mo agoIt’s small and not node - not all of us have crazy powerful machines, what’s not to like?
- creata 8mo agoIt's the static site generator of vibe coded projects.