3 ms·
What your describing is a low trust society. If you disregard the social contract like that, then people wont owe the "the world" anythign either. Collaboration
by samrus 8mo ago
What your describing is a low trust society. If you disregard the social contract like that, then people wont owe the "the world" anythign either. Collaboration and civics goes out the window. If you want to look at what kind of a shithole that libertarian nonsense leads to, then try taking a stroll in SF at night
- tjwebbnorfolk 8mo agoYou get out of society what you put into it. If I want a seamless web of deserved trust, then of course I need to contribute to that. I don't consider that to be saying that society "owes" me something. I regard it mutually beneficial, not some kind of debt/debtor relationship.
- bombcar 8mo agoThis is an important framing - we talk so much of "rights" but if you have a right to something, that means someone or someones have a duty to provide it.
- _DeadFred_ 8mo agoMan I am on the wrong tech site. Where are all the geeks that grew up on Trek and want to create a better future where society provides for it's citizens?
- direwolf20 8mo agoHacker News is a system for marketing and finding new hires for Y Combinator
- svnt 8mo agoThey are here, following the prime directive.
- latexr 8mo agoNo, no it does not. If we say everyone has a right to clean air and water, no one else has a duty to provide it. Those are given to us for free by the planet. The issue is that rich assholes (and poor assholes who only think of getting rich) take that away from everyone else by polluting what is common to everyone.
- gspr 8mo ago> I don't consider that to be saying that society "owes" me something. I regard it mutually beneficial, not some kind of debt/debtor relationship. You know, in phrases like "you owe it to your spouse/sibling/friend/self to...", people aren't talking about formal debt. Please try to keep that kind of meaning in mind when people say that society owes its people.