2 ms·
That's an odd opinion about a language with a lot of class related features. I can only assume you have a very strong definition of OOP.
by Yokohiii 9mo ago
That's an odd opinion about a language with a lot of class related features. I can only assume you have a very strong definition of OOP.
- direwolf20 9mo agoOOP doesn't mean that your language has a "class" keyword, nor dot notation for calling functions.
- afiori 9mo agoI enjoyed the pragmatic historical definition of OOP given in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wo84LFzx5nI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wo84LFzx5nI where essential it can be seen as subtype polymorphism