4 ms·
They can now easily decrease the speed for the normal mode, and then users will have to pay more for fast mode.
by falloutx 8mo ago
They can now easily decrease the speed for the normal mode, and then users will have to pay more for fast mode.
- Aurornis 8mo agoDo you have any evidence that this is happening? Or is it just a hypothetical threat you're proposing? These companies aren't operating in a vacuum. Most of their users could change providers quickly if they started degrading their service.
- falloutx 8mo agoThey have contracts with companies, and those companies wont be able to change quickly. By the time those contracts will come back for renewals it will already be too late, their code becoming completely unreadable by humans. Individual devs can move quickly but companies don't.
- kolinko 8mo agoAre you at all familiar with the architecture of systems like theirs? The reason people don't jump to your conclusion here (and why you get downvoted) is that for anyone familiar with how this is orchestrated on the backend it's obvious that they don't need to do artificial slowdowns.
- falloutx 8mo agoI am familiar with the business model. This is clear indication of what their future plan is. Also, I just pointed out at the business issue, just raising a point which was not raised here. Just want people to be more cautious
- blackqueeriroh 8mo agoSo you are not familiar with the system architecture. Okay.