3 ms·
If that were true then why would there be such a glaringly clear example that presidential party influences economic performance?
by kingkawn 8mo ago
If that were true then why would there be such a glaringly clear example that presidential party influences economic performance?
- jfengel 8mo agoMostly coincidence. There aren't that many data points. There are under a dozen Presidents in the last half century. Too small to attribute significance. I do believe that there could be a small causative effect, but there is usually a very long delay between cause and effect.
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- dylan604 8mo agoWonder if it's more of the activist having an affect? During democrat administrations, groups like NRA scream "they're coming for your guns" causing gun sales to go up during democrat admins and then drop off during GOP admins as the rhetoric drops off.
- kingkawn 8mo agoSo the actual data is irrelevant because you can dream up of minor hypothesis?
- _DeadFred_ 8mo agoMan all kind of inferences get made on HN that new jobs will just appear after AI takes existing jobs because... jobs appeared in the past. This party/president assumption seems much more likely that that one which is based on zero actual data points but seems to be gospel to half of HN.
- jaybrendansmith 8mo agoHorseshit. We have 70 years of evidence to back it up, you cannot call it coincidence without another counter theory. Your opinion, while interesting, is irrelevant. It's clear as day in the data. You could say that the Ds govern with facts and science, the Rs govern with emotion. But what's far more likely is that the Rs believe in theories that run counter to economic principles.