3 ms·
You have the burden of proof entirely backwards...
by Tadpole9181 9mo ago
You have the burden of proof entirely backwards...
- esbranson 9mo agoI think the wrong burdens of proof are being used. "Reasonable suspicion" should be used for investigations.
- Tadpole9181 9mo agoWhat is it with the deluge of people on HN that suddenly don't believe in evidence-based reasoning?
- Schmerika 9mo agoYou've confused 'evidence' with 'proof'. There's way, way more than enough evidence to require investigation. Which could then possibly lead to a standard of proof... If tptb investigated. Which they haven't, despite all the evidence. ... Which is its own kind of proof.