4 ms·
There is no evidence this is a moral panic. > But nobody has been able to provide evidence of these things. Universities are able to provide such evidence, an
by esbranson 8mo ago
There is no evidence this is a moral panic.
> But nobody has been able to provide evidence of these things.
Universities are able to provide such evidence, and are the only ones who can.
> that everybody is getting access
There is no evidence that this is actuality, or ever will be.
The "little or no evidence" line to defeat premises is cheap.
- Tadpole9181 8mo agoYou have the burden of proof entirely backwards...
- esbranson 8mo agoI think the wrong burdens of proof are being used. "Reasonable suspicion" should be used for investigations.
- Tadpole9181 8mo agoWhat is it with the deluge of people on HN that suddenly don't believe in evidence-based reasoning?
- Schmerika 8mo agoYou've confused 'evidence' with 'proof'. There's way, way more than enough evidence to require investigation. Which could then possibly lead to a standard of proof... If tptb investigated. Which they haven't, despite all the evidence. ... Which is its own kind of proof.