3 ms·
Other than Guile as in different Scheme implementations? It's usually not too difficult to port things between Schemes. Especially if you use standard R6RS or R
by Zambyte 8mo ago
Other than Guile as in different Scheme implementations? It's usually not too difficult to port things between Schemes. Especially if you use standard R6RS or R7RS library syntax.
- noosphr 8mo agoGuiles debugging has been a nightmare in the 3.x series. Which is rather surprising since it was probably the easiest scheme to debug in the 1.x days. It got so bad I moved to racket as my daily driver.
- feastingonslop 8mo agoWhich LLM works best for Racket?
- davidelettieri 8mo agoI found gemini 3 pro to be pretty good. Overall understanding of the code, code generation capabilities and ability to explain are all pretty good.
- wwfn 8mo agoCan you say more? Guile's the only scheme I've tried (attempts at packaging for Guix). Debugging has been difficult, but I figured it was me struggling with new tools and API. Does racket have better facilities for introspection or discovery at the REPL?
- pjmlp 8mo agoYes, since years, all the way when it was still known as Dr. Scheme. It has a graphical experience similar to the survivors from Lisp is Great days, like LispWorks and Allegro Common Lisp, or Clojure with Cursive.
- pjmlp 8mo agoEven better than PLT Scheme with Dr. Scheme, now Raket has ever been? I have my doubts, given its age.
- NeutralForest 8mo agoA different scheme that has great debugging and testing and also better docs.