4 ms·
Not having parity is a property they want, similar to Starlark. They explicitly want a less capable language for sandboxing. Think of it as a language for thei
by maxbond 8mo ago
Not having parity is a property they want, similar to Starlark. They explicitly want a less capable language for sandboxing.
Think of it as a language for their use case with Python's syntax and not a Python implementation. I don't know if it's a good idea or not, I'm just an intrigued onlooker, but I think lifting a familiar syntax is a legitimate strategy for writing DSLs.
- OutOfHere 8mo agoNot having syntax parity with Python == not Python. End of story. The title stays "Python interpreter" which accordingly it is not.
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]