4 ms·

Speed is not a feature if there isn't even syntax parity with CPython.

• maxbond 9mo ago
  Not having parity is a property they want, similar to Starlark. They explicitly want a less capable language for sandboxing. Think of it as a language for their use case with Python's syntax and not a Python implementation. I don't know if it's a good idea or not, I'm just an intrigued onlooker, but I think lifting a familiar syntax is a legitimate strategy for writing DSLs.
  • OutOfHere 9mo ago
    Not having syntax parity with Python == not Python. End of story. The title stays "Python interpreter" which accordingly it is not.
    • deleted 9mo ago
      [deleted]