> I think they at least have some level of filtering for their training data to keep them legally somewhat compliant. So far, courts are siding with the "fair

> I think they at least have some level of filtering for their training data to keep them legally somewhat compliant. So far, courts are siding with the "fair use" argument. No need to exclude any data. https://natlawreview.com/article/anthropic-and-meta-fair-use-rulings-ai-model-training https://natlawreview.com/article/anthropic-and-meta-fair-use... "Even if LLM training is fair use, AI companies face potential liability for unauthorized copying and distribution. The extent of that liability and any damages remain unresolved." https://www.whitecase.com/insight-alert/two-california-district-judges-rule-using-books-train-ai-fair-use https://www.whitecase.com/insight-alert/two-california-distr...