3 ms·
I'm aware. But why rebuild 3 rather than 4, in that case?
by bigstrat2003 9mo ago
I'm aware. But why rebuild 3 rather than 4, in that case?
- apothegm 9mo agoBecause 4 was a travesty unless you’re REALLY into religion. 3 was a great game for those who prefer building over war, and the first one with a proper non-military victory option.
- TheRealPomax 9mo agoBecause the people who work on this aren't a game studio, they're Civ enthusiasts making a free version of the game they love? If you want to see a free equivalent of 4, you know what to do: start the effort.