4 ms·

I bought a piece of wooden furniture some time ago. It came with a label saying that the state of California knows it to be a carcinogen. I live in Belgium. It

• bogwog 8mo ago
  Just an observation, but this California meme seems like the go-to talking point for anti AI regulation crowd lately.
  • turtlesdown11 8mo ago
    It's not even a good argument. Studies have demonstrated it reduces toxic chemicals in the body, and also deters companies from using the toxic chemicals in their products.
  • elric 8mo ago
    That's a weird comparison, hadn't heard that one yet. I'm very much in favour of regulating (and heavily taxing) AI. But I very much dislike silly warning labels that miss the point. Owning wooden furniture is not carcinogenic. Inhaling tons of wood dust (e.g. from sanding wood in a poorly ventilated room) could be carcinogenic. But putting such warning labels on furniture is just ridiculous scaremongering.
• frm88 8mo ago
  The proposition 65 warnings apply to carcinogenic materials used on furniture surfaces which can be released into the air or accumulate in dust. None of these substances are a conditio sine qua non, there are alternatives. https://www.p65warnings.ca.gov/fact-sheets/furniture-products https://www.p65warnings.ca.gov/fact-sheets/furniture-product... The same warnings and labels are used in the EU, for example for formaldehyde which will be severely limited in its use starting in August 2026. https://easecert.com/blogs/insights/formaldehyde-emission-limits-under-reach-annex-xvii-entry-77 https://easecert.com/blogs/insights/formaldehyde-emission-li... It may look weird, but personally I prefer a warning to being submitted to toxic substance without my knowledge.