3 ms·
> This bill would require a disclaimer on something published. That’s a freedom of speech issue They can publish all they want, they just have to label it clea
by tempodox 8mo ago
> This bill would require a disclaimer on something published. That’s a freedom of speech issue
They can publish all they want, they just have to label it clearly. I don’t see how that is a free speech issue.
- mothballed 8mo agoBecause compelled speech is an insult to free speech just as censored speech is.
- fwip 8mo agoHow do you feel about the fact that manufacturers need to list the ingredients of the food they sell you?
- mothballed 8mo agoNot thrilled about it, and I personally would rather see them repealed. I will concede compelled speech impositions have been interpreted more generously when they are commercial. I don't necessarily agree with it, but even if we concede they can happen, I hope that distinction is made for commercial vs non-commercial content. Though I'm not thrilled with it happening for either.
- oblio 8mo agoI will never understand free speech absolutists. Ads should be marked, ingredients and components should be listed. What possible reason would there be for a viewer/customer to not be allowed to find out such obvious info?