4 ms·

Exactly. Why did the article author think ads weren't scams before they were "AI" generated?

• wobfan 9mo ago
  Where does the author claim or even remotely suggest that?
  • nottorp 9mo ago
    They only NOW assume all ads are scams. Suggests they didn't make that assumption before, doesn't it?
    • wobfan 9mo ago
      And in your mind NOW always means "since GenAI is a thing"? Most of the time, when people realize something, it happens NOW. Also, AI isn't even mentioned in the headline at all, and not even in the first part of the article. It's just used as one hint that it might be scam, then followed up with further evidence.
  • iso1631 9mo ago
    In the headline - the word Now implies "Ads before weren't scams but they are now"
    • wobfan 9mo ago
      And where in the headline is "AI"?
      • iso1631 9mo ago
        "Here are three ads that are scammy; the first two were clearly generated by AI, and the third may have been created by AI."
        • nottorp 9mo ago
          The "AI" evangelists are trying to explain to us that all ads are to be trusted because they're "AI" generated now...
        • wobfan 9mo ago
          Headline - aka. 4th paragraph of the article.