3 ms·

As noted above: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-119publ38/pdf/PLAW-119publ38.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-119publ38/pdf/PLAW-... : th

by ISL 8mo ago

As noted above: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-119publ38/pdf/PLAW-119publ38.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-119publ38/pdf/PLAW-... : the Attorney General was to have produced the entirety of the Epstein files, with very narrowly-enumerated redactions, in December. She has not done so. Furthermore, there are numerous allegations that the documents that have been released contain CSAM, which (referencing the PDF above) may fall afoul of 18 U.S.C. 2252–2252A. In addition, one need only glance at the action in US courts to see egregious violations of the Constitution and valid court orders playing out daily. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/26513988-trorder012826/ https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/26513988-trorder0128... https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mnd.230969/gov.uscourts.mnd.230969.29.0.pdf https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mnd.230...

deleted 8mo ago
[deleted]
typeofhuman 8mo ago
Allegations aren't evidence. Has the Administration actually been found guilty of violating the law - if that is even possible.
- jcranmer 8mo ago
  Yes, the Abrego Garcia and Öztürk detentions are two very newsworthy cases that have actually reached the point of a final judgement in the district courts, as opposed to "merely" preliminary injunctions against the government. (It's also worth noting that almost none of the government's appeals to their losses in preliminary injunctions have been on the merits as to whether or not their actions were legal, but rather on the grounds of "no one should be allowed to challenge our actions," which has also been a fairly losing argument for everybody except SCOTUS.)
- rockskon 8mo ago
  Evidence is evidence - of which there are enormous amounts of.
- anon84873628 8mo ago
  Are you expecting the administration to prosecute itself?
  - phorkyas82 8mo ago
    That's why there is separation of powers or ought to be.
- bryceacc 8mo ago
  >if that is even possible yes.... any administration can be found guilty of violating law, and should be dealt with accordingly.
- paulryanrogers 8mo ago
  > Has the Administration actually been found guilty of violating the law - if that is even possible. Obviously administrations can violate the law. Otherwise this is just an autocracy with term limits.
- 542354234235 8mo ago
  >Allegations aren't evidence Allegations are literally evidence. "He attacked me" is an allegation of a crime and is evidence that would be used in conjunction with other evidence to prosecute said crime.

by ISL 8mo ago

deleted 8mo ago

[deleted]

typeofhuman 8mo ago

Allegations aren't evidence. Has the Administration actually been found guilty of violating the law - if that is even possible.

jcranmer 8mo ago
Yes, the Abrego Garcia and Öztürk detentions are two very newsworthy cases that have actually reached the point of a final judgement in the district courts, as opposed to "merely" preliminary injunctions against the government. (It's also worth noting that almost none of the government's appeals to their losses in preliminary injunctions have been on the merits as to whether or not their actions were legal, but rather on the grounds of "no one should be allowed to challenge our actions," which has also been a fairly losing argument for everybody except SCOTUS.)
rockskon 8mo ago
Evidence is evidence - of which there are enormous amounts of.
anon84873628 8mo ago
Are you expecting the administration to prosecute itself?
- phorkyas82 8mo ago
  That's why there is separation of powers or ought to be.
bryceacc 8mo ago
>if that is even possible yes.... any administration can be found guilty of violating law, and should be dealt with accordingly.
paulryanrogers 8mo ago
> Has the Administration actually been found guilty of violating the law - if that is even possible. Obviously administrations can violate the law. Otherwise this is just an autocracy with term limits.
542354234235 8mo ago
>Allegations aren't evidence Allegations are literally evidence. "He attacked me" is an allegation of a crime and is evidence that would be used in conjunction with other evidence to prosecute said crime.