3 ms·
A cynical read of this is that it’s all a ploy to maximize usage. Why do agents need to speak to each other if they’re just doing the work correctly the first
by dangus 9mo ago
A cynical read of this is that it’s all a ploy to maximize usage.
Why do agents need to speak to each other if they’re just doing the work correctly the first time?
Is it an admission that a single agent is not useful and reliable enough?
- WXLCKNO 9mo agoI run a loop where I have 4 agents review in parallel after each implementation phase. It just increases the odds of finding issues. I've switched this over to a team of 4 now that talk to each other to discuss issues they find and it's amazing. They confirm between themselves and if they wrongly identified something the others correct them.
- dangus 9mo agoSo, the answer is yes, a single agent makes too many mistakes and you have to run four of them (4x usage cost) to improve the quality. I understand that it works better, but I am rightfully pointing out that it's less efficient. An analogy would be putting a V8 engine into a pickup truck to make it go as fast as a Mazda Miata.