4 ms·
> UX is a problem that is almost immune to money Usability testing seems like something where you can get better UX with a lot of money: https://www.nngroup.co
by legulere 8mo ago
> UX is a problem that is almost immune to money
Usability testing seems like something where you can get better UX with a lot of money: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-testing-101/ https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-testing-101/
- jaredklewis 8mo agoOh I doubt it, unless you have that person with vision to interpret the results of the usability testing and turn them into a single cohesive design. Good UX comes from someone that has deeply internalized the problems a piece of software is solving for users and the constraints on those users. Most startups do this without usability testing by doing things like sales or customer support. Anyway, IME usability testing is not the bottleneck to good UI.
- legulere 8mo agoI don't disagree with you that you need to have a singe cohesive design vision based on solving for users. But I think that certainly usability testing can lead to even better results and is mostly constrained by cost.
- jeltz 8mo agoFor sure. But without a cohesive vision throwing money at it can only make it worse if it does anything at all.