4 ms·

If this is true, it's insane that this would work: - why does CWS respond to cross-site requests? - why is chrome sending the credentials (or equivalent) in t

• cxr 8mo ago
  It's not true. The person you're responding to has a habit of posting implausible-but-plausibly-plausible nonsense, and it's not how this works at all.
  • lapcat 8mo ago
    I made the mistake of trying to skim the code hastily before I had to leave to run an errand, and yes it turns out I was wrong, but please refrain from the personal comments, and no, I don't have any such "habit."
    • cxr 8mo ago
      Wrong again. (PS: The fact that you have now replied—which automatically disables comment deletion—is the only thing that prevented my removing it just now. So great job.)
      • lapcat 8mo ago
        > The fact that you have now replied—which automatically disables comment deletion—is the only thing that prevented my removing it just now. So great job. How was I supposed to know that you intended to delete it? In any case, you may still have time to edit your comment, as I did with my erroneous root-level comment, since I can't delete that either, for the same reason.
        • cxr 8mo ago
          Not interested. You also shouldn't have done that. You broke the thread—exactly what HN's no-deleting-comments-that-have-replies check was created to prevent. Consider this: just stop being reckless.
          • lapcat 8mo ago
            I wrote an erroneous comment in haste, which I regret. However, this kind of thing happens countless times every day on HN. It's not unusual. Except perhaps the regret part: unlike me, many of those other commenters admit no error and express no regret. If you truly cared about HN etiquette as much as you claim, you wouldn't post haughty hyperbole such as "Consider this: just stop being reckless" and "The person you're responding to has a habit of posting implausible-but-plausibly-plausible nonsense," which go against the HN guidelines, as you may already know. Be honest: do you actually care about the thread? Why would you care, when you ridiculed my top-level comment? Who are you trying to save the thread for, posterity? Nobody cares. The thread had already been downvoted to the bottom of the submission, and the top-level comment was misinformation, so I removed it, because no more people needed to read the misinformation or respond to it. Nothing of value was lost, and I thought my action was prudent, but in any case, the term "reckless" makes a mountain out of a molehill. My impression is that you made a bigger deal out of this than is warranted because you appear to have some kind of strange, unexplained, preexisting grudge against me and take any minor fault as an excuse to bash me personally. I have no objection to correcting a falsehood, but please keep your personal feelings to yourself and the personal attacks out of the comments.
            • cxr 8mo ago
              Nice try. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwUswWA7cRc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwUswWA7cRc>