2 ms·
> I don’t mind the lack of a Retina screen in the first version. As we can see from the iPad 3 and 4, lighting and driving a 2048x1536 screen just can’t be done
by monkeyfacebag 14y ago
> I don’t mind the lack of a Retina screen in the first version. As we can see from the iPad 3 and 4, lighting and driving a 2048x1536 screen just can’t be done well in a small, thin, light, inexpensive device yet. Maybe next fall, or maybe the year after that.
This is being presented as though the only two choices were "retina" or 1024x768, which is obviously not true. I understand Apple's rationale for using the previous generation's resolution, but it means they shipped a device which is inferior to the competition in at least one measurable way. I'm not a spec-driven purchaser. I don't care that the iPad mini has less RAM or fewer cores than the Nexus 7 (disclosure: I own this). But a tablet's display is a critical part of the experience and I find Apple's decision here to be a let down.
- seiji 14y agoDon't over think it. They used the resolution of the original iPad and iPad 2 so no applications need to be modified. Only low end devices engage in a nerdspec race. Personal status devices are marketed as experiences and life accessories. Who gives a flip what's inside if it makes you happy?
- monkeyfacebag 14y agoThe display is on the outside.
- osukaa 14y agoThe glass is on the outside, the screen is behind.