5 ms·
Nice breakdown. Just a critique, I'm willing to bet that people were using therubyracer to compile CoffeeScript.
by mcmire 14y ago
Nice breakdown. Just a critique, I'm willing to bet that people were using therubyracer to compile CoffeeScript.
- matthuggins 14y agoActually, the twitter-bootstrap-rails[1] gem requires therubyracer[2] in order to compile LESS -> CSS. [1] https://github.com/seyhunak/twitter-bootstrap-rails https://github.com/seyhunak/twitter-bootstrap-rails [2] https://github.com/cowboyd/therubyracer https://github.com/cowboyd/therubyracer
- guybrush0 14y agoIt depends on how you integrate bootstrap: there's a SCSS conversion of Bootstrap that avoids the dependency on therubyracer, (it just requires sass): https://github.com/anjlab/bootstrap-rails https://github.com/anjlab/bootstrap-rails
- gurgeous 14y agoYes, I recognize that. Perhaps I didn't explain it clearly in the post. Nine of the teams used coffeescript, but only six used therubyracer. What did they use for js if not therubyracer? I'm guessing node. Edit: 9=>6 per the blog post