3 ms·
I suspect they're training on this. I asked Opus 4.6 for a pelican riding a recumbent bicycle and got this. https://i.imgur.com/UvlEBs8.png https://i.imgur.co
by margalabargala 9mo ago
I suspect they're training on this.
I asked Opus 4.6 for a pelican riding a recumbent bicycle and got this.
https://i.imgur.com/UvlEBs8.png https://i.imgur.com/UvlEBs8.png
- mrandish 9mo agoInteresting that it seems better. Maybe something about adding a highly specific yet unusual qualifier focusing attention?
- WarmWash 9mo agoIt would be way way better if they were benchmaxxing this. The pelican in the image (both images) has arms. Pelicans don't have arms, and a pelican riding a bike would use it's wings.
- seanhunter 9mo agoPelicans don’t ride bikes. You can’t have scruples about whether or not the image of a pelican riding a bike has arms.
- jevinskie 9mo agoWouldn’t any decent bike-riding pelican have a bike tailored to pelicans and their wings?
- cinntaile 9mo agoNow that would be a smart chat agent.
- actsasbuffoon 9mo agoSure, that’s one solution. You could also Isle of Dr Moreau your way to a pelican that can use a regular bike. The sky is the limit when you have no scruples.
- ryandrake 9mo agoHaving briefly worked in the 3D Graphics industry, I don't even remotely trust benchmarks anymore. The minute someone's benchmark performance becomes a part of the public's purchasing decision, companies will pull out every trick in the book--clean or dirty--to benchmaxx their product. Sometimes at the expense of actual real-world performance.
- riffraff 9mo agoperhaps try a penny farthing?
- TheDong 9mo agoI don't think that really proves anything, it's unsurprising that recumbent bicycles are represented less in the training data and so it's less able to produce them. Try something that's roughly equally popular, like a Turkey riding a Scooter, or a Yak driving a Tractor.