3 ms·
You: "Why did you build this?" LLM: "Because the embeddings in your prompt are close to some embeddings in my training data. Here's some seemingly explanatory
by just6979 8mo ago
You: "Why did you build this?"
LLM: "Because the embeddings in your prompt are close to some embeddings in my training data. Here's some seemingly explanatory text with that is just similar embeddings to other 'why?' questions."
You: "What could be improved?"
LLM: "Here's some different stuff based on other training data with embeddings close to the original embeddings, but different.
---
It's near zero useful information. Example imformation might be "it builds" (baseline necessity, so useless info), "it passes some tests" (fairly baseline, more useful, but actually useless if you don't know what the tests are doing), or "it's different" (duh).
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- manmal 8mo agoIf I asked you, about a piece of code that you didn’t build, „What would you improve?“, how would that be fundamentally different?
- just6979 8mo agoI would start with asking what kind of improvment, why, how, etc. Or I could just start changing things to more closely line up with whatever textbook or "Clean Code" clone book I has last read, and hope it still passes the tests and that those tests are as thorough as possible. The latter would: eventually get me fired, is stupid, and basically what the LLMs do.