11 ms·
Since there's quite a few people here working at US companies with access to lots of user data, but they may not have decision making capacity, I just thought I
by viraptor 9mo ago
Since there's quite a few people here working at US companies with access to lots of user data, but they may not have decision making capacity, I just thought I'll link the Simple Sabotage Field Manual, out of context and for no reason at all https://www.cia.gov/static/5c875f3ec660e092cf893f60b4a288df/SimpleSabotage.pdf https://www.cia.gov/static/5c875f3ec660e092cf893f60b4a288df/...
If some data is shared with an external entity, it likely needs to be included in a few usual disclaimers, with at least a few meetings to clarify the exact wording and verification of the legal implications with the right dept and double check how it complies with others data protection rules, and don't forget the audit, and I think this contains a mistake so maybe let's investigate this issue first, and ...
- deleted 9mo ago[deleted]
- frumplestlatz 9mo ago[flagged]
- mindslight 9mo agoAnd yet many more of us care about the centuries-old laws that ICE is violating.
- elnatro 9mo agoPlease, enlighten me a non-American, what laws allow shooting and killing civilians on broad light on the USA?
- Paracompact 9mo agoSome people have absolutist takes on these sorts of things. If the stated purpose makes sense ("stop illegal immigration"), they will dismiss tragedies as routine accidents of an imperfect world. If they have no sense of when exceptions become intolerable and course-correction becomes necessary, then by definition, no amount of evidence will change their mind.
- xp84 9mo agoWhat if we believe that those shootings are completely unacceptable (probably criminal), but that “have no immigration enforcement and permanently halt deportations” is also unacceptable? The latter seems to be the solution being pushed by one party. Like always, the left’s problem is that their proposed solutions read like they were written by teenagers, based on emotions and dismissive of the reasons why their supposed “enemies” disagree with them. Most Americans would support having ICE operate perhaps even entirely with nonlethal weapons. That would be a smart thing to push for! And popular too. But the party line is instead “Abolish ICE.” And of course nobody (who isn’t pro-open-borders) trusts that there’s any Democratic plan besides look-the-other-way and maybe amnesty.
- decremental 9mo ago[dead]
- AlecSchueler 9mo ago> "have no immigration enforcement and permanently halt deportations” is also unacceptable? The latter seems to be the solution being pushed by one party. What party? What makes it "seem" that way? Could you link to anyone calling for this?
- nosianu 9mo agoThose using memes along the lines of "nobody is illegal" (sometimes "on stolen land" is added)? This is a movement not limited to the US. Here in Europe there is a similar movement, using that same slogan. They don't want any borders or border enforcement at all. Merely for illustration, a single example: https://abc7.com/post/protests-expected-socal-part-nationwide-day-immigrants-movement/15860612/ https://abc7.com/post/protests-expected-socal-part-nationwid... > Protesters were seen carrying flags, signs and spraying graffiti on nearby property, including on the U.S. Courthouse sign where it read "No one is illegal on stolen land".
- AlecSchueler 9mo ago
- runsWphotons 9mo agoWhen an officer has reasonable suspicion that a civilian poses a threat to his life, he can shoot them. Once police start shooting they are trained to continue shooting until the target is incapacitated. That's the law. Whether the recent shootings you saw meet that standard is up for debate.
- runsWphotons 9mo agoAlso the officer should believe this threat is imminent.
- rcakebread 9mo ago[flagged]
- decremental 9mo ago[dead]
- Cthulhu_ 9mo agoSure, there's procedures to arresting someone and when they are allowed to shoot, that's all fine. But the danger is that these procedures are not being followed, and that there are no consequences to it. That people get killed is a tragedy, but that the people that killed them do not get the proper training, guidance or consequences for their action is a problem.
- cassepipe 9mo agoSure but the first was arguably unreasonable and the second one was omg are you f@##%&@ kidding me, didn't you see the video about a peppered sprayed guy on his belly on the ground then not possibly brandishing with no gun since it had just been removed from him ? It's fine to make reasonable sounding comments but for the love of God, a bit honesty wouldn't kill you. "The party told you to ignore the evidence you see with your own ears and eyes*
- donkeybeer 9mo agoAbsolutely, likewise we should shoot ICE officers who come near us because we have strong precedent they are mentally unstable and prone to psychotic bouts of insensate violence. Since we have more than reasonable suspicion of threat to our life.
- frumplestlatz 9mo ago[flagged]
- jacquesm 9mo ago[flagged]
- frumplestlatz 9mo ago[flagged]
- jacquesm 9mo ago[flagged]
- duk3luk3 9mo agoHere's a complete refutation of your argument: Pretti did not attempt to "de-arrest" anyone at any point. Nobody, not even ICE, DHS, the White House, or the FBI has argued this. Whoever told you this made it up. You should stop listening to whoever told you that. They are lying to you about this, and everything else they have told you is a lie too.
- jamboca 9mo agoi want to comment something violently hateful towards you. but at this point I feel bad for people like you. indeed you are already living out some twisted arc of the karmic cycle which results in your life and making this comment. i hope you find help eventually and i wish peace for you.
- frumplestlatz 9mo ago[flagged]
- jamboca 9mo agofirstly i dont dont care about you or what you have to think. second escalation is meaningless Lol what is this a boxing gym? we’re on an internet forum put simply ice is a violent private militia. and people like you won’t see it until they are knocking at your door. or never. goes back to my first point. you are already living in hell nvm this has to be bait Bye
- _DeadFred_ 9mo agoIs that the 'police don't need to identify themselves and should wear face masks' or the 'you aren't allowed to film the police because it interferes with our trying to be a secret police force' laws? Or the 'you aren't doing anything illegal but the masked government agents don't like it so they are going to use your biometrics to harass you in whatever ways the feds can make your life more difficult' laws?
- frumplestlatz 9mo ago[flagged]
- cassepipe 9mo agounder penalty of death ?
- elnatro 9mo agoDoes that law allow killing them by shooting? I suppose that officers need to detain them, read their rights, and put them in court. That’s what I thought was the core of the American Law.
- account42 9mo agoIf the officers involved had could reasonably believe that they posed an immediate lethal threat at the time, yes it does. Whether or not that was the case is for courts to figure out after things calm down and all facts have been gathered and not a valid reason to call for the shut down of entire agencies with the intent of stopping enforcement of laws you don't like.
- nullocator 9mo agoIs the immediate lethal threat in the room with us right now? I hope no one ever accidentally believes you're an immediate lethal threat simply for existing, or at least if they do, maybe you'll be lucky enough to not have yuppies on the internet trying to defend your murder. Can the officers in any of these incidents even articulate a threat, and how the only remedy was to shoot through the driver side window, or in the back of the head?
- superb_dev 9mo agoIt’s so hard to believe people posting in support of ICE aren’t trolls or bots. Are you watching them commit obscene crimes in broad daylight?
- hdgvhicv 9mo agoIs it really that hard - Trump didn’t get to power on a technicality - 70 million voted for him.
- BoredPositron 9mo agoIf you think enforcing the laws is the problem you are ignorant.
- hdgvhicv 9mo agoHurrah for the Blackshirts
- amazingman 9mo agoWe should be able to agree that no entity is authorized to violate the 2nd, 4th, 5th, and 14th amendments of the constitution. Whatever immigration laws you want to see enforced, they do not supersede the constitution.
- account42 9mo agoMight I suggest to instead reflect on why you are working in an industry that collects all this data.
- direwolf20 9mo agoMoney!
- Gud 9mo agoTo conduct field sabotage
- cmxch 9mo agoAre you sure that not even the most mediocre insider threat program doesn’t have this accounted for? Especially when they’re an industry that knows itself well? They will find out. And act accordingly. And your career will end, with the mess cleaned up and billable to you.
- viraptor 9mo ago> Are you sure that not even the most mediocre insider threat program doesn’t have this accounted for? I worked for a big corp. None of this is out of ordinary. But yeah, if you need to survive and worry about being fired, you make your own decisions that you'll be able to live with.
- deleted 9mo ago[deleted]
- potsandpans 9mo agoYou've obviously never worked in big corpo. People unwittingly deploy this whole handbook back to front throughout the entire process of the sdlc. It's impressive that anything ever gets done ever.