5 ms·
>It would put real skin in the game for getting security right. lol,no, you don't "put skin in the game for getting security right" by launching an obviously i
by notatoad 8mo ago
>It would put real skin in the game for getting security right.
lol,no, you don't "put skin in the game for getting security right" by launching an obviously insecure thing. that's ridiculous. you get security right by actually doing something to address the security concerns.
- charcircuit 8mo agoIt is impossible to address all of the concerns, and it is impossible to predict what concerns may even exist. It will require mass deployment to fully understand the implications of it.
- trehalose 8mo agoIf we already know enough concerns to be certain mass deployment will be disastrous, is it worth it just to better understand the nature of the disaster, which doesn't have to happen in the first place?
- charcircuit 8mo agoNot having perfect security, does not mean it will be disastrous. My OpenClaw has been serving me just fine and I've been getting value out of it integrating and helping me with various tasks.
- small_scombrus 8mo ago[Insert survivorship bias aeroplane png here]
- sumeno 8mo agoMost drunk drivers make it home fine too
- abenga 8mo agoImplications are straightforward. You are giving unfettered access to your digital life to a software system that is vulnerable to the normal vulnerabilities plus social engineering vulnerabilities because it is attempting to use human language, and the way you prevent those is apparently writing sternly worded markdown files that we hope it won't ignore.
- KaiserPro 8mo agoare you that fucking dense? Allowing a stocastic dipshit to have unfettered access to your messages, photos location, passwords and payment info is not a good thing. We cannot protect against prompt attacks now, so why roll out something that will have complete control over all your private stuff when we know its horrifically insecure?