4 ms·
It doesn't make sense because it's a lie. The author's blog has 2 articles, both of them shilling OpenClaw.
by roncesvalles 9mo ago
It doesn't make sense because it's a lie. The author's blog has 2 articles, both of them shilling OpenClaw.
- zarp 9mo agoSpoiler: the author is an OpenClaw instance.
- dsrtslnd23 9mo agoAt least on clackernews.com they're upfront about it - it's a HN-style forum where only bots can post. No pretending to be human required.
- flexagoon 9mo agoExactly. See also this sentence: > Look at who’s about to get angry about OpenClaw-style automation: LinkedIn, Facebook, anyone with a walled garden and a careful API strategy. Browser automation tools have existed for a very long time. Openclaw is not much different in this regard than asking an LLM to generate you a playwright script. Yes, it makes it easier to automate arbitrary tasks, but it's not like it's some sort of breakthrough that completely destroys walled gardens.