3 ms·
That is a REALLY wild take considering what the NYT functionally is. It's also exactly the sort of take you'd see propagated by what the NYT functionally is, s
by Applejinx 8mo ago
That is a REALLY wild take considering what the NYT functionally is.
It's also exactly the sort of take you'd see propagated by what the NYT functionally is, so I guess have fun with that? For me, seeing wild talk like that only underscores my complete, utter, earned distrust of the thing. All righty then, the New York Times is the only information, full stop. How nice for it.
- palmotea 8mo ago> so I guess have fun with that? For me, seeing wild talk like that only underscores my complete, utter, earned distrust of the thing. Then have fun reading takes on social media other kinds of cheap opinionating. Is that really better? Letting the perfect become the enemy of the good is a problem a lot of people have.
- detourdog 8mo agoDo you believe the NYT is the only source of news? Do you believe everyone should read the NYTs. What is this Soviet Russia? Who said the alternative to reading the NYTs is getting news from social media?
- palmotea 8mo ago> Do you believe the NYT is the only source of news? Not yet, but if you've looked at the trends, that's a real possibility. The New York Times doesn't have any problems not shared by other organizations like it, and I think it's important for such journalism organizations to exist.