> You're arguing that if a country is attacked, it's ok to kill civilians that are unrelated to the attack? If a country is attacked, and defends itself, are y

> You're arguing that if a country is attacked, it's ok to kill civilians that are unrelated to the attack? If a country is attacked, and defends itself, are you saying it should stop any form of defense because a civilian can die? If this is the logic, then what would prevent armies from using human shields?