4 ms·
> despite an insignificant fraction of customers using such a feature? Isn't that the exact same argument against Lockdown mode? The point isn't that the numbe
by gabeio 8mo ago
> despite an insignificant fraction of customers using such a feature?
Isn't that the exact same argument against Lockdown mode? The point isn't that the number of users is small it's that it can significantly help that small set of users, something that Apple clearly does care about.
- PunchyHamster 8mo agonow I want to know what dirty laundry are their upper management hiding on their devices...
- tosapple 8mo agoThe 'extra users" method may not work in the face of a network investigation or typical file forensics. Where CAs are concerned, not having the phone image 'cracked' still does not make it safe to use.
- stouset 8mo agoLockdown mode doesn’t require everyone else to lose large amounts of usable space on their own devices in order for you to have plausible deniability.
- achierius 8mo agoLockdown mode costs ~nothing for devices that don't have it enabled. GP is pointing out that the straightforward way to implement this feature would not have that same property.