44 ms·
In such a case specifically: Uncover internal communication that shows the company was aware of the problem and ignored it, which presumably affects liability a
by myrmidon 9mo ago
In such a case specifically: Uncover internal communication that shows the company was aware of the problem and ignored it, which presumably affects liability a lot.
- ndr 9mo agoI wonder what they will find. They seemed to have acknowledged working on the problem before. https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2011432649353511350 https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2011432649353511350
- verdverm 9mo agoHave you seen some of the stuff in the Enron or Epstein emails? They can be rather candid and act as if there is nothing to hide or they will never get caught Elites need a reckoning
- YetAnotherNick 9mo agoDo you think they communicate via paper? Raiding office doesn't automatically gives them access to mail/slack etc. And internal comms could be asked for without the nuclear option of raiding the office
- myrmidon 9mo agoI'd expect to find most of the incriminating stuff in emails and short messages. > And internal comms could be asked for without the nuclear option of raiding the office Relying on the accused to compile and provide evidence seems naive to me.
- YetAnotherNick 9mo agoCompanies are required by law to enable persistence. And in any case if we assume malice how would the police even get access to all emails by raiding if the message and mails are stored in cloud. AFAIK police can just ask google/slack for the mails with proper warrant.