2 ms·
You're going to always have a better experience from Web Frameworks that officially support and have tested their stuff on Mono. We've added special normalizin
by mythz 14y ago
You're going to always have a better experience from Web Frameworks that officially support and have tested their stuff on Mono.
We've added special normalizing support to match the behaviour of IIS/ASP.NET where we can, e.g. imitate redirects + case-insensitive file paths, etc. This reduces the differences when porting your ASP.NET app across to run on Linux.
Now that it's open source and MVC is accepting patches, MVC3 might be more stable on Mono.
- itsboring 14y agoI think the problem here specifically is mod-mono and the fastcgi server (basically the xsp-derived glue). I've seen a number of people complain about memory leaks and instability and having to restart apache. It's not readily reproducible but it's enough to make people too nervous to deploy. Those sub-projects appear to be unmaintained and queries about their status on the mailing list go unanswered. Without some solid info there, it unfortunately makes the open source MVC stuff rather moot. I concluded (perhaps wrongly?) that web wasn't a priority for mono and chose another technology for that part. On the other hand, mono makes a great socket server stack, and I still use it extensively there.