3 ms·
No one has managed to come up for an improvement for the zodiac system used in astrology. There's countless studies on it, all inconclusive at best, once subje
by dlcarrier 9mo ago
No one has managed to come up for an improvement for the zodiac system used in astrology. There's countless studies on it, all inconclusive at best, once subject to reproduction and meta analyses. Should we keep using, despite a lack of evidence, because there's nothing better? Why not just discount it completely? If discounting astrology completely is the right move, than so is discounting the NOVA system.
- NoPicklez 9mo agoWe don't really "use it" and what do we use it for in the first place. Think about what the zodiac system is used for and we absolutely have alternatives. What giving people insights into their personality based on an arbitrary star pattern during the year. We do have other approaches to explain peoples personality and behavior traits that are based on evidence and science as opposed to the stars and their birth date. What we're talking about here is similar to the food pyramid, its a generalised approach to helping people understand what they should and shouldn't eat specific to the type of food and level of "processing". Something developed based on rising scientific evidence of the impacts of large consumption of highly processed or hyper palatable foods. I'm not saying we shouldn't use the NOVA system, I'm asking those that bash it to come up with an alternative approach or remodel it. The same way the food pyramid has changed, whilst the zodiac system hasn't.