3 ms·
Will there be something more geared towards learning more than what the individual parts are/do besides from naming it from a chart? E.g. more like the biomecha
by chillax 14y ago
Will there be something more geared towards learning more than what the individual parts are/do besides from naming it from a chart? E.g. more like the biomechanics of it?
- gingerlime 14y agoAt the moment we're focusing on memorizing the actual terms/structures, which seems like that most mundane and frustrating part with 'standard' anatomy learning tools (and the primary reason we created kenHub). To be honest, we're not too sure what the next steps are. We want to cover the core aspects first before we add more functionality. This is why we're trying to gather some feedback at a fairly early stage. That said, we're certainly thinking about other aspects of anatomy, medicine and learning we could expand to.
- chillax 14y agoHm. There might be interest in a tool for learning more about movement etc. in the (strength) traning community. E.g. I would be really interested in learning more about functional anatomy as present in this article for instance: http://robertsontrainingsystems.com/blog/round-back-deadlifts/ http://robertsontrainingsystems.com/blog/round-back-deadlift... Perhaps /r/fitness over at reddit and/or /r/weightroom might be able to chime in with some feedback. Anyways, started at the lower extremities this afternoon and it's been fun so far. :-) Haven't delved into the texts in the library yet, so I'm slowly decoding the meaning of superior/inferior etc. Your approach makes sense.