2 ms·
I concur, open-source will be more reputation based and no doubt, in the future, LLMs can also act as a quality gate. I work a lot with quants (who can program
by LaurensBER 9mo ago
I concur, open-source will be more reputation based and no doubt, in the future, LLMs can also act as a quality gate.
I work a lot with quants (who can program but are more focused on making money than on clean-code) and Opus 4.5 and Kimi 2.5 are extremely good at giving them architecture guidance. They tend to overcomplicate some things but the result is usually miles better than what they produced without LLMs.
- blibble 9mo agoas we're doing anecdotes: I work with quants too their LLM "assisted" work seems to be the roughly the same quality (i.e. bad), but now there's much more of it not an improvement
- pjjpo 9mo agoOne issue I found is that for new projects, it is much harder to market now. shownew is flooded and subreddits have turned up their spam filters high so quality projects will have trouble getting eyes without significant social activity before wanting to share. So the bar for introverts writing (not vibing) good OSS feels like it has gone up in an unfortunate way.