5 ms·
Clickbait/editorializing in submission title. Also: Paper doesn't robustly support this statement. The actual title of the paper: "Flourishing in Sweden: Great
by lysace 9mo ago
Clickbait/editorializing in submission title. Also: Paper doesn't robustly support this statement.
The actual title of the paper: "Flourishing in Sweden: Great overall — but not for all"
But the poster clearly knows what kind of title makes a post fly.
- MisterTea 9mo agoPage 21, 4.6 Conclusions explains it quite clearly: > ... our findings highlight notable disparities—particularly among young adults—that underscore the need for more targeted efforts to promote flourishing across all segments of Swedish society.
- lysace 9mo agoDoes it really?
- nonameiguess 9mo agoThis was posted to Reddit's r/science five hours or so before the submission here, under roughly the same title but longer since Reddit allows longer titles. I'm sure they just saw it made r/all over there and figured copying it over more or less verbatim would achieve the same engagement as everyone plays with their favorite bugaboos about old people and maybe 3 people out of 100 wonder if the effect is consistent that young people are just generally less happy than older people regardless of the specific time at which you ask.
- lysace 9mo agoSo it's a litmus test of HN. Better than Reddit or not?