3 ms·
Whether you fundamentally trust your provider to try to do what they agreed 'isn't particularly relevant to service quality and stability'? Did you really mean
by josephlord 14y ago
Whether you fundamentally trust your provider to try to do what they agreed 'isn't particularly relevant to service quality and stability'?
Did you really mean that?
- xentronium 14y agoThe whole lifetime plan debacle was a really big blunder from PR standpoint, but I wouldn't go as far as to call it a rip-off. Deal that started in 2004-2006 and lasted through to 2012 is 6 to 8 years worth of hosting. As far as I understand, they also offer one more year of free hosting as a compensation, which makes it 7 to 9 years. 7 to 9 years of hosting for $500 is okay in my books. Of course, that doesn't make their PR blunder look any better, they should've just swallowed the costs, but I don't 'fundamentally distrust' them based solely on this case.
- emperorcezar 14y agoMaybe not a rip-off, but still a lie.
- rdtsc 14y ago> Deal that started in 2004-2006 and lasted through to 2012 is 6 to 8 years worth of hosting. As far as I understand, they also offer one more year of free hosting as a compensation. You might have to excuse some here who actually understand lifetime and unlimited to mean more than 6 to 8 years. > but I don't 'fundamentally distrust' them based solely on this case. But do you see how others would though?