> If the blog author wanted to make some kind of point he should have included MUCH longer graphs, not just half a year. They do, in the "looked like" link of

> If the blog author wanted to make some kind of point he should have included MUCH longer graphs, not just half a year. They do, in the "looked like" link of the second paragraph (http://sargasso.nl/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/hadcrut4_a.jpg http://sargasso.nl/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/hadcrut4_a.jpg). But that doesn't change the fact that they're beating on DM for misrepresenting the data, rather than making the argument that 16 years to too short.