4 ms·
Depends what "right" is. They can certainly sell a lot of papers, no doubt. But do they help make create an informed electorate? Which is the most important fun
by jiggy2011 14y ago
Depends what "right" is. They can certainly sell a lot of papers, no doubt. But do they help make create an informed electorate? Which is the most important function of a free press.
The biggest problem I have with the Mail is not whether it is biased or even that it makes mistakes.
My problem is more that they will often print a headline and first paragraph or a story that makes some claim that is often refuted in the article itself. I feel that this is intended to deliberately mislead those with lower critical thinking abilities.
It's amazing the number of times I've had to correct people on stuff like the legal status of Sharia courts. Of course I can't blame the mail for all of this stuff, there are plenty of other papers and blogs doing the same thing but the mail seems to be the flagship for this sort of journalism.
- saraid216 14y ago> I feel that this is intended to deliberately mislead those who don't read the entire article. Fixed that for you. Keep in mind that "reading only the headlines" is a common speed-up-your-life piece of advice. Tim Ferriss, for instance, specifically advises this. It's not really the readership's fault that the Mail is exploiting this.
- jiggy2011 14y agoNo, but it is the paper's fault.
- gadders 14y agoI'd love an informed electorate, but it would be a very tricky thing to try and define whether a particular story is informing the electorate or not, and to whose definition.