4 ms·
To over-simplify, it's about conflicting philosophical alignment: - systemd: integration and features at the cost of complexity and scope - traditional: simpl
by neoCrimeLabs 8mo ago
To over-simplify, it's about conflicting philosophical alignment:
- systemd: integration and features at the cost of complexity and scope
- traditional: simplicity and composability at the cost of boot speed and convenience
systemd conflicts against the more traditional unix philosophies as well as minimalism.
- ahartmetz 8mo agosystemd also replaces some pre-existing services with its own reimplementations that are worse. The systemd developers aren't e.g. DNS or NTP experts, but they act like it and the results reflect all that.
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- neoCrimeLabs 8mo agoYou are correct. My comment was over simplified deliberately. I felt integration and scope accounted for the details in a TL;DR one slide answer.