3 ms·
> Are you from Sweden? No. I used this interweb thing to fetch that document from Sweden, saving me a 1000-mile walk. > Why do you think the definition was cl
by chrisjj 9mo ago
> Are you from Sweden?
No. I used this interweb thing to fetch that document from Sweden, saving me a 1000-mile walk.
> Why do you think the definition was clear across the world and not changed "before AI"?
I didn't say it was clear. I said there was no disagreement.
And I said that because I saw only agreement. CSAM == child sexual abuse material == a record of child sexual abuse.
- lava_pidgeon 9mo ago"No. I used this interweb thing to fetch that document from Sweden, saving me a 1000-mile walk." So you cant speak Swedish, yet you think you grasped the Swedish law definition? " I didn't say it was clear. I said there was no disagreement. " Sorry, there are lots of different judical definitions about CSAM in different countries, each with different edge cases and how to handle them. I very doubt it, there is a disaggrement. But my guess about your post is, that an American has to learn again there is a world outside of the US with different rules and different languages.
- chrisjj 9mo ago> So you cant speak Swedish, yet you think you grasped the Swedish law definition? I guess you didn't read the doc. It is in English. I too doubt there's material disagreement between judicial definitions. The dubious definitions I'm referring to are the non-judicial fabrications behind accusations such as the root of this subthread.
- lava_pidgeon 9mo ago" I too doubt there's material disagreement between judicial definitions. " Sources? Sorry , your gut feeling does not matter. Esspecially if you are not a lawyer
- chrisjj 9mo agoI have no gut feeling here. I've seen no disagreeing judicial definitions of CSAM. Feel free to share any you've seen.