3 ms·
> I think many people here are confused as to what constitutes "stuff". I think you're just redefining "stuff" to suit your argument. In normal terms "stuff"
by jamesrcole 14y ago
> I think many people here are confused as to what constitutes "stuff".
I think you're just redefining "stuff" to suit your argument.
In normal terms "stuff" means "physical things".
You're redefining it to mean "physical things that aren't worth keeping".
If "stuff" only means "physical things that aren't worth keeping", what's the name for the "stuff" that is worth keeping?
- grecy 14y ago> You're redefining it to mean "physical things that aren't worth keeping". Of course, because we're talking about reducing clutter from our lives. So by definition if something is not worth keeping, you should get rid of it. > what's the name for the "stuff" that is worth keeping? Sometimes I use the word "possessions", or more verbose, the things I own that I get great enjoyment from. People seem to think this is all black and white - i.e. OMG, you need to get rid of your bed and toothbrush and soap otherwise you have too much "stuff". Move over into the grey area.