2 ms·
The key is "collaboration", not submission to a higher authority. As already said, can we also refrain from stupid accusations every time someone disagrees wit
by mytailorisrich 9mo ago
The key is "collaboration", not submission to a higher authority.
As already said, can we also refrain from stupid accusations every time someone disagrees with the herd?
- stingraycharles 9mo agoWhy are you replying multiple times? Your earlier comment has been flagged / removed already anyway.
- mytailorisrich 9mo agoWhy are you continuing to behave that way? Flagging/censorship, insults, nasty accusations, avoiding engagement, why? My earlier comment was presenting a perfectly legitimate opinion and questions in a civil but opiniated way, why the hate? Please, don't apologise.
- Cyprus-consult 9mo agoYou are viewing sovereignty as a legal status, but in this specific vertical (Space/SatCom), it is a function of scale. The harsh reality of 2026 is that the "Minimum Viable Economy" required to maintain orbital sovereignty—meaning a native LEO constellation and reusable launch capability, exceeds the fiscal bandwidth of any single member state. The choice is no longer "National Sovereignty" vs "EU Federalism." The choice is "Pooled EU Sovereignty" vs "Client State status to the US." We are effectively trading local political control for a shot at operational leverage. You might dislike the deal from a governance perspective, but from a systems perspective, fragmentation guarantees irrelevance.