3 ms·

Who said I'm lying?

runako 8mo ago
Fair! I was going to go back and edit, but my comment was more for other people who read your comment thinking it was a good idea for them to do (assuming they can raise their hands over their heads).
- caseysoftware 8mo ago
  Since the TSA cannot force you to prove it - after all, they're not medical personnel to evaluate it and not willing to risk your injury - whether someone lies becomes irrelevant.
  - fsckboy 8mo ago
    "i can't raise my arms over my head" doesn't contain the word "medically". could be religious reasons, or simply personal superstition.
    - twoodfin 8mo ago
      Federal judges just love this kind of language lawyering.
      - fsckboy 8mo ago
        it's legal to say "I can't raise my arms over my head". it is then prohibited to ask people about disabilities, should somebody think to inquire. I was not saying "tell this to a judge", i was telling HN that yall were making assuumptions. (assuumptions makes ass-of-you-and-you)
  - sokoloff 8mo ago
    If they decide to follow up to make an example of you, they can easily record a video of you until you raise your arms over your head somewhere later in the airport or on the flight. You won’t have a good time proving your case.
    - kmoser 8mo ago
      Just because you can raise your hands over your head doesn't mean it isn't painful. In any case, it's legal to opt-out of the scanners, so why would they care what method you use (really what language you use) to indicate you'd rather get a pat-down than go through the scanners? Either way you're complying with the law.
jader201 8mo ago
It seemed implied by: > Then I realized I could even skip that. It would make sense that you weren’t injuring yourself prior to realizing this. Again, implied. But agreed, you didn’t say it.
- caminante 8mo ago
  Don't take the bait. Either they're joking (and should've added an emoji) or more likely, parent is being childish and phrasing points to finding a "clever hack" (i.e., not injured). There's nothing clever about unethical and criminal pro tips.
Ms-J 8mo ago
They are only making bad assumptions if they said this. Any chance one gets to regain freedom, by any method, take it. In this situation proving someone is lying would be news worthy. You will win in this situation if you stand your ground.

Who said I'm lying?

Fair! I was going to go back and edit, but my comment was more for other people who read your comment thinking it was a good idea for them to do (assuming they can raise their hands over their heads).

caseysoftware 8mo ago
Since the TSA cannot force you to prove it - after all, they're not medical personnel to evaluate it and not willing to risk your injury - whether someone lies becomes irrelevant.
- fsckboy 8mo ago
  "i can't raise my arms over my head" doesn't contain the word "medically". could be religious reasons, or simply personal superstition.
  - twoodfin 8mo ago
    Federal judges just love this kind of language lawyering.
    - fsckboy 8mo ago
      it's legal to say "I can't raise my arms over my head". it is then prohibited to ask people about disabilities, should somebody think to inquire. I was not saying "tell this to a judge", i was telling HN that yall were making assuumptions. (assuumptions makes ass-of-you-and-you)
- sokoloff 8mo ago
  If they decide to follow up to make an example of you, they can easily record a video of you until you raise your arms over your head somewhere later in the airport or on the flight. You won’t have a good time proving your case.
  - kmoser 8mo ago
    Just because you can raise your hands over your head doesn't mean it isn't painful. In any case, it's legal to opt-out of the scanners, so why would they care what method you use (really what language you use) to indicate you'd rather get a pat-down than go through the scanners? Either way you're complying with the law.

jader201 8mo ago

It seemed implied by: > Then I realized I could even skip that. It would make sense that you weren’t injuring yourself prior to realizing this. Again, implied. But agreed, you didn’t say it.

caminante 8mo ago
Don't take the bait. Either they're joking (and should've added an emoji) or more likely, parent is being childish and phrasing points to finding a "clever hack" (i.e., not injured). There's nothing clever about unethical and criminal pro tips.

Ms-J 8mo ago

They are only making bad assumptions if they said this. Any chance one gets to regain freedom, by any method, take it. In this situation proving someone is lying would be news worthy. You will win in this situation if you stand your ground.